ABSTRACT
Background Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease is an autosomal dominant multisystem disorder caused by germline mutations at chromosome 3p25-26 in the VHLtumour suppressor gene. Retinal manifestations include capillary haemangiomas that develop in up to 80% of gene carriers. Lifelong retinal surveillance involves yearly assessment usually by fundoscopy and often as part of a VHL multidisciplinary clinic. Optos ultra-widefield retinal imaging is now becoming more widely used in virtual retinal screening clinics. We aimed to assess discrepancies in the pickup rate of angioma and angiomatous-associated disease between slit-lamp fundoscopy and Optos ultra-widefield imaging. Methodology A total of 49 patients had both Optos ultra-widefield retinal imaging and slit-lamp fundoscopy over 16 months in VHL retinal surveillance clinics at the John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK. Optos images were analysed for image quality and presence of angioma(s) by a Consultant Ophthalmologist who was masked to the fundoscopy findings. The pickup rate was compared between slit-lamp fundoscopy and Optos imaging. Results In total, data on 94 eyes were collected. Of the total Optos retinal images, 12.8% were positive for angiomas compared to 11.7% from the slit-lamp examination. There was a discrepancy of 1.1% (one value) where the Optos image analysis suggested a possible angioma, which was not identified on slit-lamp examination. Optos imaging identified all angiomas in this cohort. Conclusions Optos imaging was non-inferior to slit-lamp examination in this sample of 94 eyes. In the current COVID-19 climate, reducing clinician-patient interaction is important. This research supports providing retinal imaging as an acceptable alternative to the yearly slit-lamp fundus examination.